When did In house take the top spot?

This is a great article. Well written and straight to the point. When did In house take the top spot?.


KPI’s – An In-House Recruiters Friend or Foe?

Thirty years ago the recruitment industry was being run exactly the same as today, however back then there was no such thing as the internet, databases, iPhones, SMS notifications, emails, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or even ATS/Database. There was no such thing as internal or In-House Recruiters, we were all agency recruiters.

Index Cards

We had 2 sets of cards on a desk, a shared facsimile a telephone book, and of course, the telephone. One set of cards had our clients and prospects in it and the other set of cards had your candidates, and you never mixed the two.

Good recruiters kept close to their clients but more importantly they knew their candidates’ every move. They knew what roles they were going for, through which agency and even had a list called the Traitor List, which consisted of candidates who had deflected to another agency – how dare they.

The good consultants knew their numbers.

  • They knew that if they put 5 people in front of decision makers, they would get a placement.
  • They knew that if they had 50 candidates and knew exactly what they were looking for, they could find jobs for them; so they stayed close and built relationships with the people. (see this great post building relationships)
  • They knew that if their candidate went to another agency, then they [the other agency] would probably place them
  • They knew that  each ad would bring in a certain number of candidates.
  • They knew the cost of getting a candidate and valued that cost
  • They knew that you don’t advertise on a long/holiday weekend as no one looks for jobs on holiday weekends and it was a waste of money.
  • They knew that if you didnt get back to applicants in 3-5 days, the applicant was gone.

Back then, the more people you spoke to, and the more people you introduced to hiring managers, the more placements you made.

Today, nothing has changed. The more people you introduce to hiring managers, the more placements you will make. However, one major change has occurred, recruiters now have all the tools you could possibly imagine and, unfortunately, they have become lazy.

Thats right, lazy. “How dare you” I can hear coming from readers, “I am not lazy!” Yes you are……..in comparison to the good consultants of 1983.Lazy Consultant

In a massive generalisation (which I am leaving myself open with), In-House, Internal or Corporate recruiters today have it easy. They throw an ad on an internet job board, have a look on LinkedIn and wait. How many of them know what the cost of acquisition is for a candidate, what the cost and efficiencies of the different types of internet job boards are, what their candidate utilisation rate is, how a poorly worded ad effects candidate utilisation. The answer is 2-5% of the internal (we wont even start on how many agency recruiters know) recruiters are versed in such language.

The costs of an Internal / In-house Recruitment team is massive. If a company has 5 recruiters on an average of $70k (TEC) per person, that is $350,000 in salaries alone. Couple that with advertising, LinkedIn membership, overhead, ATS/Database subscriptions, IT cost, and you have close to $700,000 worth of annual investment. So a company has a right to demand certain KPI’s be met.

Here are the KPI’s we (The In-House Recruitment Group) use with the in-house teams we run for our clients

  • Time to hire – time taken to fill the role
  • Cost of candidate acquisition – Monthly/Quarterly cost associated with candidate acquisition.
  • Cost per hire -total cost per hire including recruiter time, candidate costs, advertising etc.
  • Candidate utilisation – number of candidates in the database that are being utilised. If they are not going to be used, they shouldn’t be in the database
  • Advertising channel efficiencies – measuring the number of candidates (not applicants) that come from each ad and the costs associated
  • New hire turn-over – fall off rate of new hires
  • Applicant : Candidate ratio – how many applicants become candidates
  • Candidate : Interview ratio – how many candidates are interviewed by hiring managers
  • Interview : offer ratio – how many interviews to offer.

By using the above KPI’s we are able to ensure our recruitment teams are as efficient as possible. As they say, if you measure it, you can manage/improve it, and if you can improve it, then everyone is happy.

So, are KPI’s the In-House recruiters’ friend or foe…………….

For more information on KPI’s for recruiters, contact us at www.inhouserecruitmentgroup.com or click here to complete our contact form.

In-House Recruitment Group Logo

This post was written by Steve Begg, MD of In-House Recruitment Group. Steve can be contacted on +61 (2) 8005 6299.

Social Media and Recruitment

Last week I was taking with a  client about using Social Media for recruitment. The conversation went something like this.

Client: we have a “New” Facebook Fan Page so we are all sorted with our Social Media presence, but thanks anyway. 

Me: “that is brilliant, congratulations. How are you going to use your new Social Media presence in your talent sourcing strategy?”

Client: “what do you mean?”

Me: “how are you going to find talent from your Facebook page?”

Client: looking like I asked a trick question, “we will post our jobs on the page and they [the candidates] will come”

Me: “oh, ok. Uhm, how will they [the candidates]  know you are on Facebook?”

Client: another blank look, “I don’t know, doesn’t everyone just know?”

I am not going to go on as I think the picture has been painted. The fact is that everyone thinks if they just build a Facebook page and post their jobs on it, then they [the candidates] will come. Its what I call the “Field of Dreams” theory. 

This particular company had invested over $10,000 (which is ridiculous in itself) to have a Facebook page built only to have someone like me destroy it as they hadn’t thought through the rest of the picture. 

In a brilliant post on www.ere.net titled Great Expectations: The Reality of Finding Talent on Facebook by Raghav Sing (http://www.ere.net/2012/05/18/great-expectations-the-reality-of-finding-talent-on-facebook/) Raghav talks about the fact that using Social Media for recruitment is not about posting jobs on Facebook, it about building a talent community and engaging with them. That’s great, however how do you do build a community and engage with them?

This takes time and resources. To do it quickly, you need to have resources available to trawl the chosen Social Media elements and drop themselves into conversations. 

Social Media is like any other community and it doesn’t like to be sold to. If all you are doing is pushing content onto people they will soon stop listening. 

Here is an example. I was recently in the market for a new Laptop. I walked into a reputable electronics chain and started to ask questions, a fact finding process I needed to got through before I purchased. This quickly turned from a fact finding mission (for me) to a sales opportunity (for the sales assistant). They pushed and pushed for a sale until I walked out of the store. 

Remember, I wasn’t ready to buy so don’t try and make me. I then went to another outlet where I asked the same questions, and received much better answers and no pressure. When I was ready to buy I walked straight past store 1 to store 2 where I bought the laptop, a case, a new router and a printer. Its the “Pretty Woman” theory, although I didn’t feel as though I had to go back to store 1 to rub it in their face.

When it comes to building a talent community, here are some tips

  • Build a resource centre to continually comment on relevant topics. (ask us how if you are unsure on this)
  • If you are after engineers, talk to engineers, listen to their grievances and use this information as a topic of conversation. 
  • Always answer their questions. Never gloss over their concerns. This is your opportunity to address any concerns they may have.
  • Remember provide information that is relevant. They don’t care about the amount of leaves in your gutters at home.
  • Be consistent.
  • Always be there, i.e., if someone asks a question today, they don’t want an answer in 2 weeks time. That moment, thought or topic has passed.
  • Don’t try a sell to the audience straight away and please don’t try and close prematurely. You will only drive them away.

There are ways and means you can use to constrain the costs of a resource centre. Have a look around, you would be amazed what you can find to help.

In-House Recruitment Group Logo

Author: Steve Begg – Managing Director, In-House Recruitment Group – Australia 

Phone: +61 (2) 8005 6299